aphant.org
home / reddit

AI, Tools, Programming, and External Organization

How aphantasic users relate to digital tools, AI, programming, and external memory aids — answering research.md §7.

Methodology

1. AI as practical prosthetic for missing imagery

The metaphor pre-pass (reddit/metaphors/ai_tools.md) found prosthetic-use outweighing tech-discussion roughly 13-to-10 within sampled literal mentions. Targeted retrieval here confirms that split. The dominant pattern is image generators rendering book characters or scenes; a secondary cluster uses ChatGPT to talk through visual or spatial ideas. The strongest framing calls Claude a "prosthesis" without qualification:

"I also consider my condition to be a serious disability and Claude is literally a prosthesis. It's quite hard to have no sensory data that stays, a few bullet points for memory and no inner monologue of voice." 2026 · t1_odp7361 ↗

Other users describe specific image-generation workflows. A common pattern is iterating with DALL-E or Midjourney chapter-by-chapter through a book to substitute for absent visualisation:

"I use Midjourney heavily to help bridge the gap between concept and reference in my art bc of my aphantasia already and I just started doing something similar bc I read so much and some books have such a lush well done world building concept that I want to try and see what it could look like" 2024 · t1_koplozk ↗

"I've been really enjoying using Midjourney. It's removed the aphantasia barrier for me getting concepts out of my mind and into a visual form." 2022 · t1_ivhkrsl ↗

"When I use AI, I give it my drawings. It really IS drawing my imagination to add the fine details. I can see my imaginations in full within a day today, took weeks do draw them before and would get bored and forget. I love the prosthetic it is when giving it my art." 2024 · t1_m3yjihd ↗

Beyond image generators, ChatGPT recurs as a learning and self-organisation aid — explaining maths/SQL non-visually, or acting as an externalised journal:

"I use ChatGPT all the time for everything. It’s like my therapist and friend. I use it to help me analyze my journal entries and tell me what I should be focusing on because I struggle to think about what matters and overthink what doesn’t matter. I use it to help me visualize a better life for myself as well and it helps me put things into perspective." 2025 · t1_nbb8ln2 ↗

Adoption is contested. The metaphor file estimated ~150–200 prosthetic-use mentions among the 1935 primary matches; AI tools are framed as missing-imagery prosthetic far more than as general-purpose tech to debate, though that framing is sometimes met with hostility from aphants who consider AI ethically dubious or unnecessary.

2. External-memory tools as compensation

This is the densest and most stable cluster in the corpus. "Take photos, take notes, set calendar reminders" is something users tell each other reflexively in any thread about memory or planning. The sub-theme has a dedicated file (reddit/metaphors/external_tools_notes_lists.md) estimating ~2,600 practical-compensation chunks within the 9,826-chunk regex pre-pass. The examples below are users who explicitly tie the practice to aphantasia.

Photographs are the most common externalisation. Heavy photo-taking is often framed as retrospective realisation:

"Ive always been that guy who takes photos of everything, and now I know why." 2020 · t1_g5wxsth ↗

"I've been asked \"why do you take so many photos?\" Before knowing that other people have visual memories, I didnt have an answer but I now know why!" 2022 · t1_hx2jc1g ↗

"I write everything down and take lots of photos because I know I won’t remember otherwise." 2022 · t1_ih271xk ↗

Calendars and reminders form a similar cluster — engineered redundancy more than habit:

"Pro tip from fellow SDAM haver: use technology as an prosthesis. Write all repeatable dates in calendar app, set alerts to remind you before the dates." 2025 · t1_nghook8 ↗

"This! My wife doesn't get it, but if it isn't on my Google calendar I don't remember to do it. Even things I've done for years." 2025 · t1_nghook8 ↗

Journaling is a third strand, often framed as access to emotional memory otherwise lost:

"I’ve taken detailed notes and journaled all my life. I never knew why until I learned about aphantasia and SDAM. I couldn’t understand why others could get by with little to no notes or no journaling." 2025 · t1_muml1p8 ↗

"I have multisensory aphantasia and SDAM, and I've found that journaling has helped me turn my sensory experiences into words that I can connect with later." 2024 · t3_1fmsr61 ↗

The externalisation hypothesis only holds for the because-of framing rather than mere co-occurrence. Both appear in the corpus, but because-of is dominant in retrieval — users repeatedly post in retrospective-discovery mode ("now I know why I always..."). Note-taking apps specifically are more contested; a 2022 Obsidian thread drew both enthusiasm and productivity-stack burnout:

"I dipped a toe in Obsidian, and Roam, and sundry other apps, but none stuck with me. I mostly use a paper notebook, plus a plain text file (each entry automatically gets a date/timestamp, courtesy of Windows' Notepad app) on my PC, with a sprinkling of Google Keep, and a touch of Evernote." 2022 · t1_iidv32p ↗

"I do think all productivity systems are bound to fail and it's very very difficult staying consistent." 2022 · t1_iih3xxq ↗

3. "Gravitated toward structured tools before I knew" pattern

Evidence is moderate, not overwhelming, and concentrated in career rather than tool-stack terms. The "I retrospectively realised why I picked X" frame is well-attested for programming as a career, less so for specific tools (terminals, CLIs, text editors). The stronger pattern is "my career choice now makes sense," not "my Vim setup now makes sense."

The clearest career-retrospect statements:

"I started programming before I found out about aphantasia. It's kinda funny to think that I make a fantasy world on a computer instead of in my head." 2020 · t1_ff9x9ic ↗

"Yeah my main subject actually is programming. Makes sense that I always chose it over other things." 2019 · t1_ee6i0q9 ↗

"I do data analytics and I have a CAD drafting degree. Looking back it definitely makes sense why I got very into CAD stuff." 2024 · t1_lpjspz3 ↗

"When I was 28 I suddenly changed careers into Geographic Information Systems and data. I found out I had a natural aptitude despite being terrible at actual maps and directions. I now realise my aphantasia has allowed me to push my semantic memory and pattern recognition to the max so making me very good at it. :)" 2023 · t1_j5qk3ae ↗

Reading and media-consumption preferences also surface in retrospect, though these are about content rather than tools:

"Before knowing I have aphantasia I remember always talking about how I preferred texts describing emotions instead of objects. Now it all makes sense." 2020 · t1_fzf3gyz ↗

What is not well-attested is a tool-stack-level statement like "I always lived in the terminal / preferred CLI to GUI / always used plain-text systems and now I know why." Targeted retrieval for "avoided visual tools my whole life," "always preferred lists and structured tools," and "explains why I always preferred coding over art" returned mostly career-level statements or off-topic results. The 2025 strengths-of-aphantasia thread has one user describing structured documentation as a strength — but as current professional practice, not retrospective:

"- Why it's in place - list all tools used and what they are for - explain in step-by-step the process (in great details, even the way to paste, if it's whole or value only). - make schematics of the process (I use mermaid language, very simple, a bit tedious sometimes).

My boss loves how she always know where things are." 2025 · t1_ncv8xky ↗

Honest read: the "gravitated before I knew" pattern is a career claim (programming, data, CAD, GIS) and a content claim (concept-heavy text over visual-rich description). It is much weaker as a specific-tool-preference claim. The corpus does not surface a coherent "I always used the terminal" or "I always preferred plain-text" sub-population via these queries. The connection users actually draw is at the cognitive-style level, not the software-choice level.

4. Visualisation-heavy interfaces described as mismatches

The cleanest mismatch is mind maps, which a stable subset of users actively dislike and explicitly attribute to aphantasia. Meditation apps that assume visualisation are a smaller recurring complaint. Mood boards and design tools are contested — some aphants describe them as essential workarounds, others as useless.

Mind maps

The 2017 "Mind Maps: Yay or Nay?" thread set the tone. Users describe bouncing off mind maps after years of being told the technique is universal:

"Anything like this is just memory torture for me. Because I can't see the position of things in front of me, as well as trying to remember what the object is I also have to remember where it is. So it's "cat to the left, lines down to a mouse on the left and a hamster on the right, over to the right of those is a dog..." all in words. It triples the amount of brainpower needed.

A list in my brain is much more efficient. A list on paper is ideal." 2017 · t3_7e1ed8 ↗

"I've never been a fan of mind maps. That is a visualizer's way of solving a problem. It makes no sense to me. It isn't how I think. My ex wife, who was probably a hyperphant loved mind mapping." 2025 · t1_n3rg4et ↗

"Mind maps are confusing and irritating, to me. I don't have problems connecting thoughts together, I have problems seeing my thoughts." 2025 · t1_n3twcrb ↗

"I wouldn’t find this useful personally. It doesn’t align with the way I think. To be 100% honest, mind maps feel like nonsense corporate PowerPoint slide material to me — not something that is actually useful to anyone, just a visual for the sake of making something visual." 2025 · t1_n3s4epz ↗

"Sudden realization about “mind maps” and why they don’t work for me" 2022 · t1_i68c7yt ↗

Caveat: a non-trivial minority of aphants do like mind maps, describing them as an externalised structure they cannot hold in mind. The pattern is "mind maps are aphantasia-shaped only for some," not a uniform mismatch.

Meditation and "visualise an apple" apps

Generic guided-meditation apps and visualisation exercises recurrently get flagged as mismatches:

"Before I find out about aphantasia, the guided meditations on apps made me feel like a fraud. 😅 “Why can’t I see what they are asking me to see?” Now it’s funny because I understand why 😂" 2025 · t1_nskxxes ↗

"This is like how most meditation apps start and I hate it." 2024 · t1_m4iiydm ↗

Mood boards, Photoshop, design tools

Split. Some aphants describe mood boards as their go-to workaround for visual creative work; others say boards don't substitute for seeing the thing in the room. The strongest mismatch quote is about Photoshop class:

"I'm an art teacher and I've taken about 5 different photoshop classes. Every time I've struggled to learn and have always hated it. I never thought it was related to my aphantasia though. Gives me something to think about." 2019 · t1_f0yc5yp ↗

"Mood boards are nice, but they don’t help me tell if something will look good in our space or with our lighting or with any of our existing furniture/walls/flooring." 2025 · t1_mem0162 ↗

A 2022 graphic-design thread has the opposite claim — mood boards as workaround: a content strategist describes finding 20-odd reference pictures per client brief in lieu of imagining the scene 2022 · t1_inz4tma ↗. The corpus supports neither pole cleanly: design tools get adopted as scaffolding by some and rejected as visualiser-shaped by others.

5. Tools users actively complain about

The complaint set is small and overlaps with §4: mind maps, visualisation-based meditation, "visualise X" self-help/manifestation exercises, and Photoshop. Lower-volume complaints: image-generation models that don't follow the user's intent (DALL-E "swapping the character's races around"), and frontend/CSS work specifically.

"I asked Dalle to generate an image after each chapter of To Kill a Mockingbird but it kept swapping around the races of the characters which made the whole exercise pointless." 2024 · t1_lwxom18 ↗

"I think aphantasia is why I find frontend frustrating. I do fullstack and infra; frontend is my least enjoyable aspect." 2024 · t1_m3st38n ↗

"Techniques of visualisation? There are no techniques of visualisation for people with aphantasia. There is nothing to visualise with. Zilch." 2023 · t1_jth0mda ↗

"Can’t manifest if I can’t visualize the future!" 2022 · t1_iidfgv9 ↗

The complaint pattern is narrower than the externalisation pattern: aphants complain about tools that demand mental imagery as input, not about UIs in general.

Synthesis: do tool preferences cluster around aphantasia?

The evidence supports a partial cluster. The corpus reliably supports: (a) AI image generators and chatbots as prostheses for absent imagery, (b) photographs, journals, calendars, and reminders as engineered substitutes for visual memory, and (c) mismatch with visualisation-demanding interfaces — mind maps, guided meditation, "picture this" self-help. The retrospective-realisation framing ("now I know why I take so many photos / always preferred coding / hated mind maps") appears across enough independent threads to be a real discourse pattern, not a brief-induced artefact.

The thinner finding: no coherent "tools-for-aphantasics" self-description. Notion has fans and quitters; mood boards are both lifeline and useless; mind maps are mostly hated but a stable minority swear by them; AI tools are prosthetic to some, ethically dubious to others in the same threads. The pattern is scattered individual workarounds with a shared diagnostic vocabulary, not a movement. Sub-question 3 is the weakest leg: the gravitated-before-knowing claim works as a career claim, not as a specific-tool claim. Without a control corpus, we cannot say even the strong patterns are distinctive to aphants.

What this answers and doesn't